Tamara Münkemüller tamara.muenkemueller@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr, Loïc Chalmandrier loic.chalmandrier@biologie.uni- regensburg.de, Giovanni Poggiato giovanni.poggiato@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr, Loïc Chalmandrier suggested: Heike Lischke - heike.lischke@wsl.ch, Loïc Chalmandrier suggested: Daniel Stouffer - daniel.stouffer@canterbury.ac.nz, Francois Massol suggested: Too many potential conflicts of interest with the authors (M. Leibold was my adviser during my post-doc and I have a paper in review with M. Barbier)., Francois Massol suggested: Suggestions of referees:, Francois Massol suggested: * Fred De Laender, Francois Massol suggested: * Alan Hastings, Francois Massol suggested: * Sebastian Schreiber, Jorge García-Girón [jogarg@unileon.es] suggested: Dear Editor:, Jorge García-Girón [jogarg@unileon.es] suggested: I am extremely sorry to decline your invitation. I am under a lot of teaching exercises at the moment and will not be able to review the paper in due time., Jorge García-Girón [jogarg@unileon.es] suggested: You can kindly consider my former supervisor Dr. Jani Heino (jani.heino@biogeo.me) as an alternative referee for this piece. , Jorge García-Girón [jogarg@unileon.es] suggested: Sincerely yours,, Jorge García-Girón [jogarg@unileon.es] suggested: Jorge, Daniel Stouffer suggested: Hao Ran Lai (haoran.lai@canterbury.ac.nz), Daniel Stouffer suggested: Malyon Bimler (malyon.bimler@unimelb.edu.au), Alan Hastings [amhastings@ucdavis.edu] suggested: Not sure. I am collaborating with one of the authors. , Malyon Bimler suggested: Dr Daniel Stouffer
e.g. John Doe john@doe.com
No need for them to be recommenders of PCIEcology. Please do not suggest reviewers for whom there might be a conflict of interest. Reviewers are not allowed to review preprints written by close colleagues (with whom they have published in the last four years, with whom they have received joint funding in the last four years, or with whom they are currently writing a manuscript, or submitting a grant proposal), or by family members, friends, or anyone for whom bias might affect the nature of the review - see the code of conduct